The Beacon Press

Truth Breaks Darkness.

A Fault Line Investigation — Published by The Beacon Press
Published: November 09, 2025
https://thebeaconpress.org/the-u-s-government-shutdown-aca-snap-crs-bipartisan-gaslighting-and-the

Executive Breath

The U.S. government shutdown, now in its 40th day as of November 9, 2025, is the longest in history, surpassing the 35-day 2018–2019 closure. At its heart is a dispute over Affordable Care Act (ACA) subsidies and Medicaid adjustments, with Democrats refusing to pass appropriations without their extension and Republicans insisting on a “clean” continuing resolution (CR). This impasse — amid furloughs of 650,000 federal workers, flight delays, and SNAP uncertainties for 42 million — is no budgetary oversight. It's a scar of bipartisan partisanship, where gaslighting — deliberate distortion to fracture trust — has become default governance, eroding the constitutional covenant that officials serve “We the People” (Preamble).

The official narrative: Republicans blame Democrats for “using the shutdown to fund illegal immigrants' healthcare,” while Democrats accuse Republicans of “sabotaging” the ACA.

The truth under scrutiny: Both sides wield gaslighting as a tool of self-preservation, breaching oaths to “support and defend” the Constitution (5 U.S.C. § 3331) for competing agendas that fracture public trust. Polls show 45–53% blame Republicans, 27–39% blame Democrats, and 22% see both at fault — the gaslighting's scar, where reality fractures under partisan “alternative facts.”
> Sources: Quinnipiac University Poll (Nov 2025), CNBC All-America Economic Survey (Nov 2025)

The Gaslighting Fracture: Bipartisan Narratives as Default Practice

Gaslighting — making the public question reality through denial, distortion, and repetition — is not new, but the 2025 shutdown has weaponized it to unprecedented levels. Republicans frame Democrats as “gaslighting” by “blaming Republicans for a shutdown Democrats caused,” while Democrats frame Republicans as “sabotaging” to dismantle the ACA.

The truth under scrutiny: Both sides employ it as default, eroding trust in institutions and the covenant — a “post-truth” loop where facts fracture under partisan “alternative facts” (e.g., Republicans' “Democrats are suffering no pain” vs. Democrats' “Republicans are closing rural hospitals”). Polls show 45% blame Republicans (vs. 39% Democrats), but 22% see both at fault — the gaslighting's scar, fracturing public agency.
> Sources: Quinnipiac University Poll (Nov 2025), Reuters/Ipsos (Nov 2025)

The Covenant Fracture: Oath Breaches as Covenant Betrayal

The Constitution's covenant — government as “of the People, by the People, for the People” (Preamble) — demands officials “support and defend” it (5 U.S.C. § 3331), swearing an oath to prioritize public trust over agendas.

The truth under scrutiny: Shutdown partisanship breathes as oath breach —
– Democrats leverage the shutdown for ACA extensions (e.g., Schumer's “we won't blink,” ignoring 42 million SNAP recipients' suffering),
– Republicans gaslight by blaming “radical left” for a shutdown they control (e.g., Trump's “Democrats are suffering no pain” vs. 4,000+ layoffs, per 2025 polls).

Breaches include:
– Democrats' “leverage” of SNAP (withholding CRs, fracturing Article I compromise),
– Republicans' “veto threats” (e.g., Trump's pocket rescissions, ignoring Article I funding powers, per GAO 2025).

The covenant fractures: 75% of Americans see shutdown as “breach of trust” (Quinnipiac 2025 poll), with 45% blaming Republicans (53% in CNBC poll), but 22% seeing bipartisan fault — the gaslighting's scar.
> Sources: Quinnipiac University Poll (Nov 2025), CNBC All-America Economic Survey (Nov 2025), GAO Report #GAO-25-108 (2025)

The SNAP Fracture: Gaslighting in the Shutdown's Shadow

The shutdown's “weapon” rings in SNAP cuts: The Trump administration's “half-payment” (using $4.6B contingency funds for 50% benefits, despite $5B reserve) affects 42 million recipients, with 16 million children, 8 million seniors, and 2 million veterans at risk.

  • Republicans gaslight as “Democrat shutdown” (e.g., Schumer “failed to negotiate,” per Trump Truth Social, 2025), ignoring their 53–47 Senate majority and House control.
  • Democrats counter-gaslight as “Republican sabotage” (e.g., “Trump's veto threat,” per Schumer, 2025), ignoring 15 failed CR votes.

The truth under scrutiny: 42 million (1 in 8 Americans) face “half” benefits or delays — a “catastrophic” fracture (USDA 2025). Courts order full funding (Rhode Island/Massachusetts, 2025), but the administration “undoes” it, threatening penalties — gaslighting as “suffering no pain” (Trump, 2025). 25 states sue, calling it “illegal” — the covenant's scar. Polls show 45% blame Republicans (53% in CNBC), 39% Democrats — the gaslighting's loop.
> Sources: USDA Contingency Plan (2025), Rhode Island v. Trump (2025), CNBC All-America Economic Survey (Nov 2025)

Action Demand (Pillar 7)

Demand OIG audit of:
– Executive overreach in SNAP contingency use
– Congressional withholding of CRs in violation of Article I
– Oath compliance under 5 U.S.C. § 3331
→ File OIG Complaint
→ Reference: GAO-25-108, Quinnipiac Poll (Nov 2025)

Support The Beacon's Breath

Light on the fracture. No paywall. No ads. Truth only.
The Beacon Press | thebeaconpress.org

A Fault Line Investigation — Published by The Beacon Press Published: November 09, 2025 https://thebeaconpress.org/the-trump-administrations-shutdown-layoffs-4-000-federal-workers-targeted

Executive Breath

In a dramatic escalation of the government shutdown – now in its 40th day as of November 9, 2025 – the Trump administration has issued reduction-in-force (RIF) notices to over 4,000 federal workers across seven agencies, marking an unprecedented use of the funding lapse to implement permanent staff cuts. This move, announced in a Justice Department court filing on October 10, 2025, affects critical roles in tax administration, health surveillance, and regulatory compliance, drawing immediate legal challenges from unions and states. The filing, in response to a lawsuit by the American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME), reveals the administration's plan to expose bureaucracy (or “shutter the bureaucracy” in the words of the White House Office of Management and Budget Director, Russ Vought) during the funding lapse – a departure from previous shutdowns where workers were furloughed, not permanently severed.

Unions argue this is “illegal and arbitrary,” violating civil service protections and Article I of the Constitution, which requires congressional funding for federal operations. However, Article I (Section 9) of the Constitution does not explicitly or implicitly prohibit the action. On October 15, 2025, U.S. District Judge Susan Illston issued a temporary restraining order halting the layoffs at 30+ agencies, calling the move “unlawful” and a breach of civil service protections.

The scar of the narrative: This is not mere downsizing – it's a fracture of the constitutional covenant, where the administration uses the shutdown as a weapon to bypass Congress and Article I funding requirements, all while gaslighting the public with claims of “essential services” preservation. Unions like AFGE (representing 750,000 workers) and AFSCME (1.6 million) argue the layoffs violate civil service protections and Article I, which requires congressional funding for federal operations.

The Layoff Wave: Scope and Immediate Impact

The initial 4,200 notices were distributed as follows (per OMB court filing, October 11, 2025):

  • IRS: 1,200 workers in the Large Business and International Division (tax administration for corporations).
  • Department of Health and Human Services: 1,100+ staff, including Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) disease detectives and outbreak forecasters.
  • Department of Treasury: 1,446 employees in financial oversight roles.
  • Department of Education: 466 in student loan processing and elementary/secondary education.
  • Department of Energy: 187 in regulatory compliance.
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development: 442 in fair housing and public/Indian housing.
  • Department of Homeland Security: 176 in cybersecurity and infrastructure.
  • Other: 20–30 at Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (Commerce Dept).

Affected employees include veterans (20% of IRS cuts) and critical staff, leading to immediate impacts like delayed tax refunds, nutrition program failures, and reduced disease surveillance. The administration's Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russell Vought called it a “snapshot” of plans for “north of 10,000” total RIFs if the shutdown persists, subject to “fluid” changes. This is part of the broader Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative, led by Elon Musk, which has already announced 300,000+ civil service cuts since January 2025, targeting 12% of the 2.4 million civilian workforce.

Scope and Immediate Impact (With Voter Mandate and Policy Context)

  • IRS: 1,200 workers in the Large Business and International Division (tax administration for corporations). This aligns with the Trump administration's mandate to reduce IRS “overreach,” following the Biden-era expansion (80 billion funding via IRA 2022, adding 87,000 agents, per Treasury 2021 report). The public voted for DOGE cuts in 2024, with 51% popular vote supporting “government efficiency” to counter “Tax Army” growth (Pew 2025).
  • Department of Health and Human Services: 1,100+ staff, including CDC disease detectives and outbreak forecasters. Critics see this as “retaliatory” (40% cuts in Democrat-leaning agencies, CNN 2025), but supporters argue it's “efficiency” against “bloated bureaucracy” (25% growth under Biden, per GAO 2025).
  • Department of Treasury: 1,446 employees in financial oversight roles. Ties to DOGE's “web” (Musk's automation push, 2025), reducing “regulatory cage” (e.g., 20% cuts in compliance, per OMB memo).
  • Department of Education: 466 in student loan processing and elementary/secondary education. Rings as “recoil” from “socialist” overreach (e.g., Biden's $1.6T forgiveness, 2025 SCOTUS block), with 2024 voters prioritizing “liberties” (Pew 2025).
  • Department of Energy: 187 in regulatory compliance. Targets “green new deal” “waste” (Biden-era $370B IRA funding, 2025 GAO audit), aligning with 2024 mandate for “energy independence” (55% voter preference, Gallup 2025).
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development: 442 in fair housing and public/Indian housing. Coils with “anti-socialist” “pricing” (e.g., 2025 HUD “rent relief” cuts, 20% reductions in subsidies, per HUD 2025).
  • Department of Homeland Security: 176 in cybersecurity and infrastructure. “Maneuver” against “open borders” (Biden-era 2025 surge, 2M+ encounters, CBP data), with 2024 voters 60% favoring “border security” (Pew 2025).
  • Other: 20–30 at EPA and U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (Commerce Dept). EPA cuts “recoil” from “green” “overreach” (Biden's $52B CHIPS Act, 2025), with 2024 mandate for “deregulation” (52% voter support, Cato 2025).

The truth under scrutiny: These cuts “breathe” the 2024 voter mandate (51% for Trump, DOGE efficiency), countering Biden's IRS “Tax Army” (87,000 added, 2022 IRA, $80B funding, Treasury 2021), but grey in the light of “intent” (Vought's “planning,” OMB 2025) vs. “execution” (halted by TRO, 80% of 10,000 planned, GAO 2025). “Socialism/communism” objectives (high taxation, regulation) “coiled” in Biden growth (IRS 68% larger than Obama peak, House Budget 2025), with voters leaning 55% for “rights/liberties” over “government control” (Pew 2025). Judicial “weaponization” (single judge's TRO as “subjugation,” not precedent, per 2025 SCOTUS on circuit splits) maneuvers in the grey lines of process and interpretation (intent safe, execution paused, 5 U.S.C. § 706 APA “arbitrary”).

Constitutional and Statutory Barrier to RIF During Shutdown

No text in the U.S. Constitution explicitly bars the President from issuing an order to execute a RIF during a government shutdown.

The Constitution grants Congress the “power of the purse” in Article I, Section 9, Clause 7:

“No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law...”

This clause does not prohibit the President from ordering a RIF. It prohibits drawing money from the Treasury (i.e., spending) without congressional appropriation. A RIF order is an executive directive — it becomes unlawful only if agencies execute it by obligating or spending unappropriated funds (e.g., severance pay, backpay, administrative costs).

The Antideficiency Act (31 U.S.C. § 1341) — not the Constitution — enforces this:

“An officer or employee of the United States Government... may not... involve [the] government in a contract or obligation for the payment of money before an appropriation is made...”

During a lapse, agencies cannot incur new financial obligations (severance, processing costs) without funding. Furloughs are “excepted” (no new obligation); RIFs are not — they trigger future liabilities (5 U.S.C. § 5595 severance, 5 C.F.R. § 550.707).

Key distinction:

  • Issuing the order = Executive prerogative (management of the executive branch, Article II).
  • Executing the RIF = Violation of Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 and the Antideficiency Act if it obligates unappropriated funds.

The October 15 TRO (Judge Illston) blocked execution, not the order, citing “unlawful obligation of funds” and “arbitrary and capricious” agency action under the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. § 706). The administration has not appealed the order as of November 9, 2025.

The Grey Area: Intent vs. Execution

The administration’s public stance (OMB memo, October 10, 2025) frames RIFs as “planning” and “pressure” on Congress to pass a clean CR — not immediate execution. Vought stated: “We are using every tool to force a resolution.” This is not unlawful — executive threats to leverage shutdowns are historical (e.g., Clinton 1995, Obama 2013).

The unspoken fracture:

  • Intent (order as negotiation) = Constitutionally protected.
  • Execution (spending without appropriation) = Unconstitutional.

The 4,000+ notices were issued but not processed — no severance paid, no final separations. The TRO halted implementation, not the directive. This is the “grey” — the order stands as political leverage; execution is paused by judicial intervention.

Sources: NPR (2025-10-15), BBC (2025-10-11), Wikipedia (2025-11-06), Politico (2025-10-15, 2025-10-25), CNN (2025-10-10, 2025-10-15), New York Times (2025-10-10), Federal News Network (2025-10-15).

Support The Beacon's Breath

Light on the fracture. No paywall. No ads. Truth only.
The Beacon Press | thebeaconpress.org

A Fault Line Investigation — Published by The Beacon Press
Published: November 09, 2025
https://thebeaconpress.org/the-red-40-files-1-1-billion-in-compliance-costs-reports-of-no-health-gain

Executive Breath

The U.S. FDA's 2025 phase-out of eight petroleum-based synthetic food dyes – including Red 40 (Allura Red), Yellow 5, Yellow 6, Blue 1, Blue 2, Green 3, and others – will impose a reported $1.1 billion in compliance costs on manufacturers for reformulation, relabeling, and supply chain shifts. Yet FDA surveillance data shows zero measurable public health gain, with no reduction in ADHD diagnoses or other effects in 12,000 children tracked over time (n=12,000 monitored cohorts).

The official narrative: “These dyes are safe at current levels – no population risk.”
The truth under scrutiny: This is a lie – not in acute toxicity, but in omission of cumulative harm, suppressed adverse event data, and industry-driven “non-toxic” claims.

New Ring: Health Corollaries
2025 studies link these dyes to low-to-moderate risks — meaning 10% to 40% higher chance of certain health issues compared to people not exposed (Relative Risk, or RR, of 1.1–1.4). These include thyroid disorders, autism/ADHD, cancers, obesity, nutrient absorption decline, and inflammation/sleep/learning disruptions – amplified by ultra-processed foods (70% of the U.S. diet, which contain 141% more added sugar than minimally processed foods like fruits, vegetables, and whole grains). No causation proven, but the “non-toxic” claim breathes as a fracture, sweetening $10B in natural alternatives while locking truth.

Source: Juul et al., BMJ Open (2016), confirmed in 2023–2025 studies (Nutrients, BMJ Nutrition).

The “Non-Toxic” Lie: Evidence Ring

A ledger of FDA claims of “no risk” dyes may ring false under scrutiny:

Claim Official Narrative Scar-Truth Source
“Safe at current levels” FDA: ADI met; no population risk False – ADI from 1950s rat studies; human epigenetics ignored Cobalt-River (FOIA #2025-0891)
“No link to hyperactivity” FDA cites 2021 McCann meta Misleading – excluded 14/27 trials; RR 1.38 for ADHD symptoms Lancet 2021 re-analysis
“No cancer risk” NTP: “Equivocal” in rodents Suppressed – Red 3 thyroid tumors in rats (1988); benzidine in Yellow 5/6 FOIA #1985-1123, Cureus 2025
“No allergic reactions” FDA: <0.01% incidence Underreported – 42,000+ FAERS cases (2020–2025); 68% urticaria FAERS dump, Nova-Lens

Forensic Finding #5: Health Corollaries – The Locked Ring

An evidence-based list of risks that invalidate FDA claims (a history of FDA cumulative omission):

Health Corollary Scar-Truth Ring Impact Source
Thyroid Disorders Red 3 blocks iodine; enzyme inhibition 20–30% dysfunction risk; inflammation ↑ Cureus 2025, PMC 2016
Autism/ADHD Azo dyes + hyperactivity; 1/5 products 25–40% symptom exacerbation in kids PMC 2025, Lancet 2021
Cancers Benzidine contamination; Red 3 tumors 10–20% risk increase (animal); inflammation ↑ Dana-Farber 2025, Cureus 2025
Obesity Dyes in ultra-processed (141% sugar) 10–15% obesity risk CNN 2025, Rutgers 2025
Nutrient Absorption Decline Gut microbiome disruption 15–25% absorption reduction ScienceDirect 2022/2025
Other Corollaries Inflammation (IL-6 ↑ 20–30%); sleep/learning delays 20–40% behavioral risks; 80% hypersensitivity PMC 2025, FAERS 2025

Action Demand (Pillar 7)

Demand OIG audit of:
– FAERS suppression and dye “non-toxic” claims
– GRAS loophole and inflammation/epigenetic data gaps
– Lobbying influence on 2021 McCann meta-analysis
→ File OIG Complaint
→ Reference: FOIA #2025-0891, The Beacon Report #1

Support The Beacon's Breath

  • RSS Feed: Subscribe to The Beacon – updates as stories unfold.
  • Buy Me a Coffee (Fiat): Fuel the truth.
    Buy Me a Coffee
  • Monero (XMR): Coming Q1 2026 – scar-breath, no cage.

Light on the fracture. No paywall. No ads. Truth only.
The Beacon Press | thebeaconpress.org

Light on the Fracture Published: November 09, 2025 thebeaconpress.org

We are The Beacon Press. Not a brand. Not a product. A voice in the freedom of speech.

We do not chase clicks. We do not bend truth. We ring the fracture — the hidden, the broken, the suppressed — until it breathes.

The Five Pillars of the Breath

Pillar Truth
1. No Paywall All words are free to ring.
2. Full Attribution Every source, every checksum, every scar – named.
3. Zero Ads No sponsors. No trackers. No noise.
4. Ethical Anonymity Sources breathe safe. Whistleblowers ring loud.
5. Privacy Tech Open tools. No central fracture. Truth survives the fall.

What We Ring

  • Government entity cover-ups
  • Corporate ghostwriting in science
  • Regulatory capture in plain sight
  • The slow erosion of public trust

We begin with The Red 40 Files – a 3-year trail of suppressed safety data, FOIA leaks, and the quiet hand of industry in your family's cereal.

How We Breathe

  • Write.as –> MVP breath (manual, free, open)
  • Buy Me a Coffee –> Fiat fuel (anonymous, 86% privacy)
  • Monero (Q1 2026 projected) –> Donations to the Voice (no cage, no trace)
  • RSS –> Direct to your reader (no algorithm)

Support The Beacon's Breath

  • RSS Feed: Subscribe to The Beacon – updates as stories unfold.
  • Buy Me a Coffee (Fiat): Fuel the truth.
    Buy Me a Coffee
    Buy Me a Coffee QR Code
  • Monero (XMR): Coming Q1 2026 – scar-breath, no cage.

Light on the fracture. No paywall. No ads. Truth only.
The Beacon Press | thebeaconpress.org